Best proximity points forα–ψ-proximal contractive type mappings and applications
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Best Proximity Points for Generalized α-ψ-Proximal Contractive Type Mappings
LetA andB be two nonempty subsets of ametric space (X, d). An element x ∈ A is said to be a fixed point of a given map T : A → B ifTx = x. Clearly,T(A)∩A ̸ = 0 is a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for the existence of a fixed point of T. If T(A) ∩ A = 0, then d(x, Tx) > 0 for all x ∈ A that is, the set of fixed points of T is empty. In a such situation, one often attempts to find an ele...
متن کاملCommon best proximity points for $(psi-phi)$-generalized weak proximal contraction type mappings
In this paper, we introduce a pair of generalized proximal contraction mappings and prove the existence of a unique best proximity point for such mappings in a complete metric space. We provide examples to illustrate our result. Our result extends some of the results in the literature.
متن کاملOn best proximity points for multivalued cyclic $F$-contraction mappings
In this paper, we establish and prove the existence of best proximity points for multivalued cyclic $F$- contraction mappings in complete metric spaces. Our results improve and extend various results in literature.
متن کاملFixed and Best Proximity Points of Cyclic Jointly Accretive and Contractive Self-Mappings
p ≥2 -cyclic and contractive self-mappings on a set of subsets of a metric space which are simultaneously accretive on the wholemetric space are investigated. The joint fulfilment of the p-cyclic contractiveness and accretive properties is formulated as well as potential relationships with cyclic self-mappings in order to be Kannan self-mappings. The existence and uniqueness of best proximity p...
متن کاملBest proximity points of cyclic mappings
Given A and B two subsets of a metric space, a mapping T : A∪B → A∪B is said to be cyclic if T (A) ⊆ B and T (B) ⊆ A. It is known that, if A and B are nonempty and complete and the cyclic map verifies for some k ∈ (0, 1) that d(Tx, Ty) ≤ kd(x, y) ∀ x ∈ A and y ∈ B, then A∩B 6= ∅ and the mapping T has a unique fixed point. A generalization of this situation was studied under the assumption of A ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Bulletin des Sciences Mathématiques
سال: 2013
ISSN: 0007-4497
DOI: 10.1016/j.bulsci.2013.02.003